Keeping a sense of Perspective

Socialising outside of the PhD bubble

I met up with some old friends and their families at the weekend, none of whom are doing or have done PhD’s (although the majority are from science background and a couple are commercial researchers). We chatted for a while about work, and I explained a bit about my career plans. It was interesting in hindsight that I found myself explaining my plan for finishing the PhD and for finding a post-doc in a slightly defensive way. My friends have little in depth knowledge about the process of a PhD and would have next to no interest whether it takes 3 years or 5 years to finish. They were approaching it as “it’s really cool you’re doing a PhD, what’s next?” and I was hearing “it’s nearly been three years why haven’t you finished yet and got a postdoc?”! So why did I feel so vulnerable talking to them about it?

I think the answer is down to the intensity of the PhD experience; although we work with people on a diverse range of projects typically everyone we interact with at work is on the same treadmill and we measure ourselves against each other’s progress and the 3 year “deadline”. It is a commonly accepted fact that PhD’s are rarely completed within, or on 3 years (a quick calculation of recent new Dr’s here gives an average completion time of 3 years 9 months) indeed most European country’s programmes are 4 or even 5 years. This places a psychological burden on people doing a PhD in that from the outset you are working towards a goal that few people will achieve. I stated from the outset I wanted to finish in 42 months (not 36), but I have felt the increasing burden of expectation in my third year. There is a sense that you are a slight failure if you do not complete in 3 years, and people seem increasingly reluctant to ask people writing-up when they are hoping to finish the longer they go on.

This is a tricky issue and I think it stems from the funding time of UK PhD’s (although I’d be interested to hear the experiences of non-UK people in the comments) and as such I don’t think there is much we can do to avoid it. However I think a sense of perspective can really help people from getting too down-hearted about the grind to complete. Ultimately a PhD is a job, an apprenticeship if you like, and although important no one should define their self-worth solely on how good or competent they are at their job.

For those of us with partners outside of academia it can be a valuable reality check, but by socialising outside of the PhD bubble from time to time, particularly with old friends you can get a sense of perspective that completing a PhD is a great achievement whether you finish it in 3 years, or 3 years and a bit…


One comment

  1. I think there is no harm in having goals and attempting to finish your PhD on time. It’s always been my aim, if only from a financial perspective.

    The question could be asked – if a PhD usually takes more than three years, why do funding bodies typically only provide three years of funding? It’s no less arbitary than four years or 42 months. Hence, a PhD takes three years.

    And I slightly disagree that there is a sense of failure associated with not finishing ‘on-time’. Having spoken to people that have completed their studies, I would say that whilst finishing before your funding runs out is impressive (to some people), over-running by six or 12 months is unlikely to negatively effect you – some would argue spending that time to make it perfect is worth it. I think the problems arise when you’re a year or more overdue.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: